Comparison calculation: Forklift vs. AMR Robot

When automating logistical processes, it is essential to compare the financial benefits of different solutions. Below, we analyze the annual costs of a forklift versus an AMR, considering labor costs for a single shift.

Assumptions

For this comparison, we consider the following costs and parameters:

Forklift

• Purchase price: €40,000
• Operator wage: €19 per hour
• Working hours per week: 40
• Lifespan: 5 years (260 weeks)

AMR (Autonomous Mobile Robot)

• Leasing costs: €2,100 per month
• No operator required (fully automated)

Annual Costs of a Forklift

To calculate the annual costs of a forklift, we account for both depreciation and operator wages.

Depreciation
The purchase price of the forklift (€40,000) is depreciated over a 5-year lifespan:

• €40,000 ÷ 5 = €8,000 per year

Operator Wages
Operator wages are based on 40 working hours per week, at €19 per hour, for 52 weeks a year:

• €19 × 40 hours × 52 weeks = €39,520 per year

Total Annual Costs of a Forklift

• Depreciation (€8,000) + Operator Wages (€39,520) = €47,520 per year

Annual Costs of an AMR

For the AMR, costs are limited to leasing, as no operator is required. This makes the AMR a more efficient option with no additional labor costs.

Leasing Costs
The monthly leasing cost is €2,100. Annual costs are:

• €2,100 × 12 months = €25,200 per year

Total Annual Costs of an AMR

• Leasing Costs = €25,200 per year

Cost Comparison

• Forklift: €47,520 per year
• AMR: €25,200 per year

As shown, the annual costs of the forklift are significantly higher than those of the AMR. The operator wages for the forklift contribute heavily to this difference, while the AMR operates fully autonomously without requiring an operator.

Conclusion: AMR Robot vs. Forklift

This comparison highlights that the AMR is a cost-efficient solution compared to the forklift. The lower annual costs of the AMR become even more appealing when multiple shifts are involved, as businesses can save significantly on both labor costs and capital expenditures by opting for an AMR.

While this calculation is simplified, it demonstrates a clear advantage for companies seeking cost savings in their logistical processes. It is always important to consider specific business circumstances and any additional costs when choosing the best solution for your company.